Qoohme

HahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahaha?? ELIMIN8

HAHHAHAHAHAH HILARIOUS NICK

No way why would I ask u if we are going out aha Marlena.

hahaha idk

heeeellllllllloooooooo doyouevengame

heyyyyyy kik me - scaredwatermelon

Do u like watermelone

haha yessssss :3

Who is Caitlyn k?...?

haha um a friend sorta but idk if she even likes me as a friend anymore :S

The most boring person you know?

A guy I know who I call Jard ick but with no spaces. :)

Who keeps asking if me and u are going out it's just so annoying coz we are besties aha

haha I think it's u Marlena? hahaha :) idk who it is but yeah haha

Who would you take a bullet for?

Brooke OMG I love her

fukwit

yep.

Do you still like Caitlyn k

not love no way I have a girlfriend that means the world to me. I want to be friends with Caitlyn but idk if she even likes me :/ :((.

I think you and Caitlyn k should be together

we'll people don't want that. kik me - scaredwatermelon

wadiyatalkinabeet

You and Caitlyn Kiel where meant to be and still are. I wish u can see that

sorry people don't want that. :/

The best movie so far in 2014?

69

What's your kik?

scaredwatermelon

You ======================3

Heyy :3

Are you and Marlena going out?

wadiyatalkinabeet?

Caitlyn k. She's a ***** why do u like her

i haven't talked to her in like 2 weeks and she's not a ***** she's really nice! please leave her alone

Who do you miss right now?

Nicki Manaj :3

What is your favorite piece of clothing?

loom bands if there clothing?...

ahah. and i also said i didn't really wanna go out with you! :") melanieveltmeyer

yeah ik u said u wouldn't go out with me cuz it would rewin my friend ship. idc get on with ur life! cuz I have :")

What happened

idk what happened!? :O

Why do u like Caitlyn she's such a *****

Caitlyn who?... I know about 5 Caitlyn's lol. be more specific XD

Who do ya like (it's Marlena hehe)

haha I've already told u haha ;)

Just coz Molly said to doesn't mean u have to! :')))))

yeah ik!! and I told Melanie what Molly said and then, Melanie said that she like liked me! plz stop! :")

Pfft. Ur pathetic. U realise it's ur fault u hate her. U asked her out and she didn't want to say no coz she didn't want to hurt u! I always knew u two weren't gonna last! And she only ever wanted to be friends! She never wanted anything more! :')

we'll when we were friends Molly told m to ask her out and I told Melanie what she said. Melanie said that she did like me sooo yeah :/ and idec please go away stalker

Honest thoughts on Melanie?

ugh. why?... :(

Thoughts on clare :') hai Oskar :3

Clare, you are really really nice, a bit pretty :3 um haha really funny and a really nice mate! :)

Your father's name?

Marcus.

How much is enough money for you?

about 1,000,000,000 a week :/ jks idk!

OMG!! just f u c k up! take this to the coordinators or something because it's fkn annoying! Melanie just leave the kid alone! no need to have a spaz just coz yous broke up (: have a nice day rubythompsonn

<3 thank you!! :) plz Melanie.

The greatest moment in your life ?

I dont have one. :( but I would LOVE to meet Tobuscus. :")

F up king hell melanie!!! Leave Oskar alone seriously you have broken up get the **** over it grow up move on and get a fuvking life ~ Molly have a nice flight x

thx Molly. :")))

i hope your happy! coz guess what! my cousin is sticking up for YOU! >:( melanieveltmeyer

I know she is the freaking nicest cousin anyone could have!! she is really nice!!!

too afraid of haters are you? and why don't you wanna? there has to be a reason! :") melanieveltmeyer

OMG Melanie. Seriously just go away!

do it! melanieveltmeyer

no! plz stop sending me "questions"!

Oskar your awesome don't listen to the haters :)
Finally know how to use this thing haha

haha. thx! kik me: oskyipad don't judge xD

Thoughts on kaza

really kind funny and pretty... lol xD

Caitlyn likes u

hahaha :))

you honestly think i give a s hit if any more people hate me? and no that's not being nice. coz now im asking you to post it on insta! do it. i actually dare you! melanieveltmeyer

I didn't ask to play truth or dare! and I would of chose truth! :")

you said you'd post it on insta.so post it!or otherwise your lying again!and i really wouldn't care!and you think posting something will make the WHOLE school hate me?well then you must be pure stupid!and anyway. HATERS GONNA HATE! potatoes gonna potate!:") melanieveltmeyer

if I don't post it on insta then I'm a liar? no, that means I'm nice. and I never said the whole school was gonna hate u. :/

go ahead. you think id care? :") melanieveltmeyer

I'm not gonna do it so dw! but yeah I think u might care. uve already got enough haters and u don't want more!

ahh... yeah i do. would you like an example? melanieveltmeyer

no Melanie plz go away or I might post this on insta! :")

i know it was a joke! fark! maybe you should take a joke!:") melanieveltmeyer

haha I do! U don't ****ing tell any! :")

please no. id rather not touch you. let alone f ucking you! melanieveltmeyer

omg! it's a joke m8! take a joke! jeez!

STOP MELANIE PLSS

plz!

k. so you didn't know the meaning before! so you were lying again! :"). melanieveltmeyer

no, I did know the meaning! I just wanted to make it completely clear for ya! :")

yeah. well. you asked me out so that was your choice. and the question was what's the definition of s lut. not why am i a s lut. melanieveltmeyer

haha yeah but it's your decision to say yes or no :")

k. what's the definition of s lut then? :") melanieveltmeyer

To get the definition of another word, try using Wiktionary For other uses of the word "definition" itself, see Definition (disambiguation) A definition attempts to explain a word using other words. This is sometimes challenging. Common dictionaries contain lexical, descriptive definitions, but there are various types of definition - all with different purposes and focuses. A definition is a statement that explains the meaning of a term (a word, phrase, or other set of symbols).[1] The term to be defined is the definiendum. The term may have many different senses and multiple meanings. For each meaning, a definiens is a cluster of words that defines that term (and clarifies the speaker's intention). As an example: To successfully define the word "Vegan", the definiendum (the word "Vegan" itself) must be given a definiens (actually vegan has at least two definiens: One is "someone who avoids using animal products", and another definiens is "someone from a place called Vega, Norway"). A definition will vary in aspects like precision or popularity (e.g. globally, the word "Vegan" rarely refers to the definiens "someone from Vega, Norway"). There are also different types of definitions with different purposes and focuses (e.g. intensional, extensional, descriptive, stipulative, and so on). A chief difficulty in the management of definitions is the necessity of using other terms that are already understood or whose definitions are easily obtainable or demonstrable (e.g. a need, sometimes, for ostensive definitions). A dictionary definition typically contains additional details about a word, such as an etymology and the language or languages of its origin, or obsolete meanings. Contents [hide] 1 Basic considerations 2 Intension and extension 2.1 Divisio and partitio 3 Definition by genus and differentia 3.1 Rules for definition by genus and differentia 3.2 Essence 4 Recursive definitions 5 Working definitions 6 Limitations of definition 7 In medicine 8 See also 9 Notes 10 References 11 External links Basic considerations[edit] In formal languages like mathematics, a "stipulative" definition guides a specific discussion. A stipulative definition can only be disproved by showing a logical contradiction.[2] A stipulative definition might be considered a temporary, working definition. On the other hand, a "descriptive" definition can be shown to be "right" or "wrong" with reference to general usage. A precising definition extends the descriptive dictionary definition (lexical definition) of a term for a specific purpose by including additional criteria, which narrow the set of things that meet the definition. C.L. Stevenson has identified persuasive definition as a form of stipulative definition which purports to state the "true" or "commonly accepted" meaning of a term, while in reality stipulating an altered use (perhaps as an argument for some specific belief). Stevenson has also noted that some definitions are "legal" or "coercive" — their object is to create or alter rights, duties, or crimes.[3] Intension and extension[edit] Main articles: Intension and Extension (semantics) An intensional definition, also called a coactive definition, specifies the necessary and sufficient conditions for a thing being a member of a specific set. Any definition that attempts to set out the essence of something, such as that by genus and differentia, is an intensional definition. An extensional definition, also called a denotative definition, of a concept or term specifies its extension. It is a list naming every object that is a member of a specific set. Thus, the "seven deadly sins" can be defined intensionally as those singled out by Pope Gregory I as particularly destructive of the life of grace and charity within a person, thus creating the threat of eternal damnation. An extensional definition would be a list of the seven. In contrast, while an intensional definition of "Prime Minister" might be "the most senior minister of a cabinet in the executive branch of government in a parliamentary system", an extensional definition is not possible since it is not known who future prime ministers will be. One important form of the extensional definition is ostensive definition. This gives the meaning of a term by pointing, in the case of an individual, to the thing itself, or in the case of a class, to examples of the right kind. So you can explain who Alice (an individual) is by pointing her out to me; or what a rabbit (a class) is by pointing at several and expecting me to 'catch on'. The process of ostensive definition itself was critically appraised by Ludwig Wittgenstein.[4] An enumerative definition of a concept or term is an extensional definition that gives an explicit and exhaustive listing of all the objects that fall under the concept or term in question. Enumerative definitions are only possible for finite sets and only practical for relatively small sets.[citation needed] Divisio and partitio[edit] Divisio and partitio are classical terms for definitions. A partitio is simply an intensional definition. A divisio is not an extensional definition, but an exhaustive list of subsets of a set, in the sense that every member of the "divided" set is a member of one of the subsets. An extreme form of divisio lists all sets whose only member is a member of the "divided" set. The difference between this and an extensional definition is that extensional definitions list members, and not sets.[5] Definition by genus and differentia[edit] Main article: Genus–differentia definition A genus–differentia definition is a type of intensional definition, and it is composed by two parts: a genus (or family): An existing definition that serves as a portion of the new definition; all definitions with the same genus are considered members of that genus. the differentia: The portion of the new definition that is not provided by the genera. For example, consider these two definitions: a triangle: A plane figure that has 3 straight bounding sides. a quadrilateral: A plane figure that has 4 straight bounding sides. Those definitions can be expressed as a genus and 2 differentiae: a genus: A plane figure. 2 differentiae: the differentia for a triangle: that has 3 straight bounding sides. the differentia for a quadrilateral: that has 4 straight bounding sides. When multiple definitions could serve equally well, then all such definitions apply simultaneously. For instance, given the following: a rectangle: a quadrilateral that has interior angles which are all right angles. a rhombus: a quadrilateral that has bounding sides which all have the same length. both of these definitions of 'square' are equally acceptable: a square: a rectangle that is a rhombus. a square: a rhombus that is a rectangle. Thus, a 'square' is a member of both the genus 'rectangle' and the genus 'rhombus'. In such a case, it is notationally convenient to consolidate the definitions into one definition that is expressed with multiple genera (and possibly no differentia, as in the following): a square: a rectangle and a rhombus. or completely equivalently: a square: a rhombus and a rectangle. Rules for definition by genus and differentia[edit] Main article: Fallacies of definition Certain rules have traditionally been given for this particular type of definition.[6][7][8] A definition must set out the essential attributes of the thing defined. Definitions should avoid circularity. To define a horse as 'a member of the species equus' would convey no information whatsoever. For this reason, Locking[specify] adds that a definition of a term must not consist of terms which are synonymous with it. This would be a circular definition, a circulus in definiendo. Note, however, that it is acceptable to define two relative terms in respect of each other. Clearly, we cannot define 'antecedent' without using the term 'consequent', nor conversely. The definition must not be too wide or too narrow. It must be applicable to everything to which the defined term applies (i.e. not miss anything out), and to nothing else (i.e. not include any things to which the defined term would not truly apply). The definition must not be obscure. The purpose of a definition is to explain the meaning of a term which may be obscure or difficult, by the use of terms that are commonly understood and whose meaning is clear. The violation of this rule is known by the Latin term obscurum per obscurius. However, sometimes scientific and philosophical terms are difficult to define without obscurity. (See the definition of Free will in Wikipedia, for instance). A definition should not be negative where it can be positive. We should not define 'wisdom' as the absence of folly, or a healthy thing as whatever is not sick. Sometimes this is unavoidable, however. We cannot define a point except as 'something with no parts', nor blindness except as 'the absence of sight in a creature that is normally sighted'. Essence[edit] Main article: Essence In classical thought, a definition was taken to be a statement of the essence of a thing. Aristotle had it that an object's essential attributes form its "essential nature", and that a definition of the object must include these essential attributes.[9] The idea that a definition should state the essence of a thing led to the distinction between nominal and real essence, originating with Aristotle. In a passage from the Posterior Analytics,[10] he says that we can know the meaning of a made-up name (he gives the example 'goat stag'), without knowing what he calls the 'essential nature' of the thing that the name would denote, if there were such a thing. This led medieval logicians to distinguish between what they called the quid nominis or 'whatness of the name', and the underlying nature common to all the things it names, which they called the quid rei or 'whatness of the thing'. (Early modern philosophers like Locke used the corresponding English terms 'nominal essence' and 'real essence'). The name 'hobbit', for example, is perfectly meaningful. It has a quid nominis. But we could not know the real nature of hobbits, even if there were such things, and so we cannot know the real nature or quid rei of hobbits. By contrast, the name 'man' denotes real things (men) that have a certain quid rei. The meaning of a name is distinct from the nature that thing must have in order that the name apply to it. This leads to a corresponding distinction between nominal and real definition. A nominal definition is the definition explaining what a word means, i.e. which says what the 'nominal essence' is, and is definition in the classical sense as given above. A real definition, by contrast, is one expressing the real nature or quid rei of the thing. This preoccupation with essence dissipated in much of modern philosophy. Analytic philosophy in particular is critical of attempts to elucidate the essence of a thing. Russell described it as "a hopelessly muddle-headed notion".[11] More recently Kripke's formalisation of possible world semantics in modal logic led to a new approach to essentialism. Insofar as the essential properties of a thing are necessary to it, they are those things it possesses in all possible worlds. Kripke refers to names used in this way as rigid designators. Recursive definitions[edit] A recursive definition, sometimes also called an inductive definition, is one that defines a word in terms of itself, so to speak, albeit in a useful way. Normally this consists of three steps: At least one thing is stated to be a member of the set being defined; this is sometimes called a "base set". All things bearing a certain relation to other members of the set are also to count as members of the set. It is this step that makes the definition recursive. All other things are excluded from the set For instance, we could define natural number as follows (after Peano): "0" is a natural number. Each natural number has a unique successor, such that: the successor of a natural number is also a natural number; distinct natural numbers have distinct successors; no natural number is succeeded by "0". Nothing else is a natural number. So "0" will have exactly one successor, which for convenience we can call "1". In turn, "1" will have exactly one successor, which we would call "2", and so on. Notice that the second condition in the definition itself refers to natural numbers, and hence involves self-reference. Although this sort of definition involves a form of circularity, it is not vicious, and the definition has been quite successful. Working definitions[edit] A working definition is chosen for an occasion and may not fully conform with established or authoritative definitions. Not knowing of established definitions would be grounds for selecting or devising a working definition. Or it refers to a definition being developed; a tentative definition that can be tailored to create an authoritative definition.

Dw Oksar I like u

thanks Clare :))

I replied to the 1 sayin 'do u even like Oskar?' but i deleted it like 2 days ago! and i never got the 'ur a s lut. your welcome' 1. but thx nice to know that u know the meaning of 's lut'! :") btw that was sarcasm coz you clearly don't know the meaning! melanieveltmeyer

yeah I know the definition!

Who makes you happy?

friends.

Are you a ****in druggo?

nup plz piss off bailey lol

definitely not me? that's not what i heard? :/ melanieveltmeyer

yeah that's what I heard! hahaha I think I know who I love lol and it's define toy not u :")

lol your actually so pathetic! :") melanieveltmeyer

sure! :")

ahhh... what questions? :") melanieveltmeyer

****, and do u like Oskar :")

please kindly go on kik. thanks! :") melanieveltmeyer

kk

If you had to like someone who would it be

your mum

Who do you like

idek. Definetly not Melanie tho. :(

How do u know Catherine s?

she dosent go to lilydale high. And because she went to the same primary as me

Does Clare and Caitlyn go to ur school

idk who r u?

Nick who?

Rowe. now go s*ck a fat 1 hahahaha

What's Catharine, Clare,Caitlyn and nicks last name

cathrine squires, Caitlyn idek, and a nick rowe

Do u like anyone besides Melanie
Or some close girl friends

yeah, uum if u mean girls then I'm friends with Cathrine s, Clare and I guess Caitlyn nick gf a little bit... all of them as in friends tho. if that makes any sense.

Who is your man crush

hmmmm... I'm not gay, I love a girl called Melanie. but if I WAS gay. hmm. probably pewdiepie!! Hahaha jks I don't really know :')

How many really good friends do you have?

5... why??

Who was the first person you dated?

A girl in kindergarten called Madeline.

Hi? Baileyluscombe

hi...

Do u play xbox or ps3 m8? ;) u know who dis is

Melanie's 4th cousin? and I used to have PS3 but now I've switched to xbox cuz swag :P

loveyou!:*

Thanks! if ur a boy plz piss off cuz I'm not gay and if it's u Melanie then I love u too! and if it's someone random talk on kik: oskyipad

What do you think about the most?

idk ? what I look like, my fitness, Melanie. :)

Melanie is my 4th cousin, she is a wonderful person! You have such a beautiful girlfriend :)

ik! she is beautiful!! but she won't believe that. :"( I love her xD

why do u like Melanie??

because she is beautiful, nice and funny :)

Do u like waffles

umm idk! xD I guess and ik it's u nick! >:)

;) melanieveltmeyer

<3

Who is your crush? Dont be shy

Melanie :)

f uck off molly! you know there's nothing going on so just f uck off! melanieveltmeyer

:")

I think you and that melanie chick have a thing going on :')

is this a question? xD

who do you like?:")

I don't really know yet lol

What is your mother's name?

skunk. it seriously is tho.

heyy melanieveltmeyer

hey.